Wednesday, 29 February 2012

Images of race in the media?

This particular poster is from the commision for racial equality and uses sarcasm to deliver its message. For example, "scared?,you should be. hes a dentist." could be looked at as a picture from the BNP to suggest that racial minoritys are getting too high powered jobs. However, the main reason of the picture is a play on the fact that the man is a dentist, and many people do not like going to the dentist.

The second poster is an advertisement for a rape alarm showing a white woman looking scared of  and sitting well away from a black man on the bus. The slogan "because its a jungle out there" could be seen as the fact that because the man is black, that he lives in the jungle.

At first glance of this image, I instantly knew that it matches Alvardo’s maxim of people from different races (namely Aborigines in this case) being portrayed as ‘exotic’. They’re being shown performing acts that are native to their culture, such as spear-fishing and making boomerangs, as a way of enticing British people to come and see the Aborigines exotic way of life in Australia. In contrast to the previous images, this exotic portrayal is not a bad thing like the ‘dangerous’ perception was – but the Aborigines would not call themselves ‘exotic’. Their way of life just seems exotic to us because it is completely different to our own culture – Aborigines may even see the British culture as ‘exotic’. Australia is just feeding of their diverse culture in order to advertise and accumulate more money in their own tourism industry without much benefit to the supposedly exotic Aborigines.

This headline is obviously trying to create a somewhat humorous impact on the reader – it is addressing a real event and turning it into something that we, as the audience, can make fun from. For this reason, I think this image relates to Alvardo’s ‘humorous’ maxim of the representation of different races in our media. The headline was probably never meant to be taking literally, yet the reader would be stunned at the strange statement – most likely stunned into laughter.
 
This poster is attempting to address the terrorist situation and scare people into looking out for potential terrorist activity, but it does it with an underlying focus on one group of people – Muslims. At first glance, I assumed that it was informing me to look out for any person that could be a terrorist, with no particular reference to skin colour or religion but examining it further, it does focus on the Islamic religion. The eyes seem to be that of a woman – we know it is a woman without having to see the rest of her face because the surrounding black background acts as a traditional Islamic hijab that hides the rest of her face. She seems frightened as though she may be hiding some terrible terrorist plot, but the fact that the rest of her face is hidden makes her seem more dangerous (as in Alvardo’s maxim of diverse cultures being represented as ‘dangerous’) to us as we have no idea what she is hiding under her hijab. Moreover, the way the poster depicts terrorists as “them” and “they” separates them even more from our own white British society and, combined with the image, gives the impression that they are completely different from us in terms of political views and skin colour. In my opinion, this image is extremely damaging to our society in that it makes white people more cautious and differentiated from Islamic people.

Wednesday, 8 February 2012

Representation Of Black Youth In Attack The Block 2011

Released in cinemas on the 13th May last year, Attack the block turned out to be an extremely popular film amongst UK teenagers. With the films moral being that predominately black teens from council estates aren’t always out to cause trouble, its teen viewers were appreciative not to be stereotyped. However with the DVD release date being not long after the horrific London riots, has the moral behind this film been jeopardized?
The film is set in a London council estate, where a group of gang members closely escape an attack from something that was clearly not from this planet. The gang step up to taking on these aliens in order to protect their hood. They are rewarded at the end of the movie as they manage to wipe out the aliens, saving the town and proving that they will go to extremes to claim what is theirs.
Franz Drameh plays the character ‘Dennis’ – one of the main gang members. I asked him whether he agreed with the moral of this movie being about council estate teenagers not being ‘all bad’. He said,
“The film starts out with teens being portrayed in a stereotypical way, with the gang robbing a defenceless woman. Then it shows what teenagers are really like, just normal people. I don’t think the moral is necessarily that teenagers are now doing good, but rather that teens from any background are not one-dimensional, they do right and wrong like everyone else”.
I personally agree, there has not yet been a case where the portrayal of a character or group has changed peoples’ opinions on them. This particular gang is only a stereotype, we are aware that it is a fictional film and that this certain behaviour does not necessarily occur in every teen group.
I also asked him how he felt about the DVD release date being shortly after the London riots and whether he believed that there was some connection. He said,
“The riots did show a negative view of teenagers, however they were only really committed by a handful of trouble-makers. I don’t think that the riots and Attack the block have any correlation, as the film is fictional. Yes, there are some underlying themes of council estate teenagers but it is not a political film. It is a genre movie about an alien attack, we need to bare that in mind”.

Representation Of Black Youth in Kidulthood (2006)

The British youth is stereotyped as violent, aggressive, hoodie wearing, knife carrying thugs; who do nothing but drink, take drugs, have sex and cause trouble to society. However, this is portrayed in Kidulthood similarly for the majority of the film. Firstly, the main characters in the film are mostly black and may be suggesting more black people cause trouble than white people do. Alisa is pregnant, representing the youth are not careful or just have unprotected sex. Becky, sells her body for money and this is presenting that the youths will do anything for money and almost show no care to themselves. Jay and Mooney who are apart of a gang with Trife (Trevor) (leader), Mooney carries a knife with him. Curtis (Trife's uncle) is a drug dealer. Sam is the antagonist in the film and bullies everyone for everything and even makes a girl (Katie) commit suicide due to it all, whilst his girlfriend Claire is white, she is represented as a 'slut' more or less, and who gets around with anyone at any time. There are some scenes of drug use where Alisa and Becky sniff 'crack' and drink alcohol for fun in Becky's house whilst they are away. Also the ending scene with the house party included loads of alcohol and under age drinking. Both these are obviously portrayed as a negative representation. As well as the violence through the film, it's casual, like an everyday thing. In one particular scene where Jay tried to buy alcohol, has no ID to prove his age and therefore walks out with the drinks whilst the shop keeper gets a bat, expecting this behaviour and Jay throws something at the shop keeper with aggression. Another scene that shows violence is the burger joint - Mooney has onions in his burger and instead of negotiating for a new burger or money back, he gets up (with the gang) and throws the burger at one of the cooks' face whilst she looks down and hangers her head as if there is nothing she can do. The 2 most significant scenes in the film for violence are the beating of Sam, and the house party end scene which results in the death of Trevor after being attacked by Sam.